THINK IT Services

One of the topics which leading Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) vendors and industry analysts are most vehement about is that software vendors cannot survive and succeed supporting a ‘hybrid’ model.

This issue arises every time an incumbent software vendor–my definition of a “ISV”–rolls out a SaaS solution while also trying to sustain its legacy, on-premise application. There are plenty of impediments to success in this balancing act across the entire lifecycle of a product extending from software development and delivery to sales and support. These technological and organizational challenges are major obstacles to success for ISVs trying to keep pace with the SaaS movement.

However, despite growing interest and adoption of SaaS as well as other ‘cloud’ computing alternatives among organizations of all sizes, many IT and business decision-makers continue to feel that they must make an ‘either/or’ judgement when it comes to on-premise versus on-demand solutions. This often confronts with an unnecessarily polarized set of options rather than giving customers a variety of complementary choices that enable them to locate their applications wherever they like.

I believe that this no longer needs to be the case. Instead, I think SaaS and cloud computing vendors should adopt a different attitude toward the hybrid model to better respond to their customers’ preferences. If vendors adopt this new approach, it could remove one of the last barriers to broad-based acceptance of SaaS and cloud computing among small- and mid-size businesses (SMBs), as well as large-scale enterprises.

As I’ve written, and many others have stated elsewhere, building and selling a traditional software product is fundamentally different than delivering and supporting a SaaS solution. Supporting these two differing models creates internal redundancies and external conflicts which are costly, inefficient and doomed to failure in most cases.

Having said that, I’m becoming convinced that some ISVs can survive and will succeed by offering customers the choice of an on-premise and on-demand solution. In fact, I think it will be necessary to do so in order to satisfy the demands of those customers who are not comfortable with relying on a ‘cloud’-based solution to meet their IT or business needs.

While customer concerns about where a software solution, or even the application data, resides may not be entirely rational at times, it may not be necessary in the future for ISVs to have to convince them to part with their data or depend on an application hosted in an unknown location.

Instead, a variety of players in the SaaS and cloud computing market are leveraging an ‘appliance’ approach which permits customers to deploy the vendor’s on-demand solution behind the firewall where it is regularly updated and upgraded via a synchronization process similar to that which has become acceptable in a variety of other situations, such as managed storage, back-up and security services. It is also becoming possible with Google Docs offline and Adobe Air.

This idea is already being demonstrated by companies like Cast Iron Systems in the data integration arena; NTRglobal in the remote support management services business; and St. Bernard in the security solutions realm.

Although none of these companies are delivering major enterprise applications, they are all offering customers the choice of deploying their equally important solutions in the ‘cloud’ or behind the firewall.

And, if Google, IBM, Microsoft and others can modularize their data center capabilities into ‘pods’ which can be deployed anywhere, what is to prevent Salesforce.com or other enterprise SaaS vendors from doing the same thing with their applications.

(I’ve been hearing rumors for a while that Salesforce.com is already allowing some of its largest customers to host its applications behind the firewall.)

Now, it is important to note that this approach still requires an ISV to evolve its software design to sit on a single multi-tenant style architecture and code base in order to be operationally feasible and cost-effective.

But, the enabling technologies are quickly evolving to satisfy these requirements. And, customer demand definitely exists to make this approach readily acceptable and profitable.

Let me know if you think I’m crazy or if you know of other examples which support my argument.

As the Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) “gold-rush” intensifies, industry consolidation is inevitable. The latest example of this consolidation process is today’s announcement by NetSuite that it intends to acquire OpenAir.

This announcement not only reaffirms the SaaS industry consolidation trend, but it also is the latest example of a company profiled by THINKstrategies being acquired shortly thereafter. Other examples include,

• Vtrenz which was acquired by Silverpop
• Everdream was acquired by Dell
• AimNet was acquired by Cognizant
• Corio was acquired by IBM

(Contact me if you’d like a copy of our Strategic Thinking profiles on these companies.)

I had the privilege of talking with Zach Nelson, CEO of NetSuite, and Morris Panner, the CEO of OpenAir, moments before today’s announcement was made public. They indicated that the acquisition was based on a trend which THINKstrategies has seen coming for a few months now.

Prospective SaaS users are not only seeking more industry-specific SaaS solutions, they are also looking for more strategic sources for these SaaS solutions. Instead of contracting for a series of SaaS point products from a wide array of vendors, corporate decision-makers, both business and IT, are taking a closer look at the SaaS vendors’ overall portfolios, platforms, partner ecosystems and financial viability so they can establish broader, long-term relationships with a fewer number of SaaS suppliers.

While the OpenAir acquisition gives NetSuite a stronger foothold in the professional services market, I think the acquisition also gives NetSuite a stronger set of human resource management (HRM) capabilities in its horizontal portfolio of enterprise applications.

Although the acquisition is another example of a Boston-based tech vendor being acquired by a west coast based company, the good news for OpenAir’s employees and the Boston area SaaS community is that NetSuite plans to use the acquisition as a beachhead for further investment aimed at establishing a greater east coast presence centered in the Hub.

Interestingly, NetSuite refers to its OpenAir plans as based on Oracle’s acquisition model and plans to operate OpenAir as a stand-alone product group with tighter integration to NetSuite’s platform. This reference just reinforces market perceptions of the close alignment of NetSuite with Oracle, and keeps alive suspicions that NetSuite may be acquired by Oracle in the future.

In the meantime, Zach Nelson and Morris Panner told me they will do all they can to maintain OpenAir’s relationship with Salesforce.com via the AppExchange, and build on their other third-party relationships, including their respective channel partners.

Having gone through a number of unsuccessful acquisitions, I know first-hand about the various issues that can get in the way of these transactions achieving their business objectives. However, I think NetSuite and OpenAir have a very good chance of succeeding because they have the right combination of complementary executive personalities, solution capabilities, channel partners and geographic orientations.

The next question is what this acquisition means for OpenAir’s primary competitor, QuickArrow? My bet is that they will also be an acquisition target in the coming months.

HP’s decision to acquire EDS cannot be faulted when measured against all the standard metrics for doing a mega-deal in the traditional technology world. It gives both companies greater scale and access to more corporate customers without a lot of overlap.

The problem is that we are in the midst of a fundamental change in the way customers acquire technology and the way they perceive their vendors. The HP/EDS combination doesn’t fit this new world order.

There is no question that EDS strengthens HP’s hand when it comes to building and managing complex enterprise data centers. The acquisition also gives EDS ready access to HP’s installed base of customers.

Wherever there are big systems integration and ongoing management projects to be won, HP/EDS will be in a better position to compete with IBM and the off-shoring companies than they were a day ago as two separate companies.

However, many corporations are looking for new ways to leverage technology that permit them to be less dependent on traditional data centers. This no longer means simply outsourcing their data centers to the IBM’s and EDS’s of the world, but transforming where and how they obtain computing power.

Check the market stats of the leading research firms who follow the outsourcing business and you’ll see the number and size of traditional IT outsourcing (ITO) deals has been declining for the past few years.

Corporations are fed up with the hassles of managing their own IT operations, but they are equally dissatisfied with the poor track record of traditional ITO deals.

The ineffectiveness of legacy systems and software combined with the inflexibility of traditional ITO arrangements has driven a growing number of companies of all sizes to evaluate and adopt a widening array of on-demand Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) and managed services.

This is a shift I first identified in 2006. Gartner finally recognized this trend two years later when it proclaimed in January,

“…the outsourcing market has reached a tipping point with regard to utility delivery models, and that change and innovation will take hold and accelerate in this area through 2008 and beyond. More providers are developing utility-based offerings across infrastructure, application and business process domains. The trend toward software-as-a-service (SaaS) is gaining the most traction…”

Unfortunately, EDS brings nothing to the table when it comes to SaaS, managed services or other utility-based offerings. Instead, it saddles HP with lots of aging people, facilities and business ideas that haven’t kept pace with today’s realities.

Since HP has also failed to establish any thought-leadership or demonstrate any market leading capabilities in the SaaS or managed services markets, it isn’t likely that it will be a catalyst for change within EDS’ calcified operations.

So, the question is how long will it take for the EDS acquisition to bring HP down or can the combined entities wake up in time to respond to the changing marketplace?

As I’ve suggested multiple times, the major hardware and software vendors are aggressively pursuing the tremendous business opportunities in the managed services market.

Now, the key questions are how will they bring these offerings to market and what role will their channel partners play in provisioning these new services?

The two most recent examples are IBM’s new Express Advantage security-as-a-service offerings and Dell’s April 24 closing of its MessageOne acquisition.

IBM’s security-as-a-service solutions are its first on-demand offerings based on its acquisition of Internet Security Systems in August 2006. The new solutions will primarily serve small and midsize businesses (SMBs). They include Express Penetration Testing Services; Express PCI Assessments; Express Multi-Function Security Bundle, which includes protection against worms, spyware, anti-virus and spam in a unified threat management offering; and Express Managed Protection Services for Servers.

These solutions have been historically been offered as on-premises offerings, but Peter Evans, director at IBM ISS, is quoted in eWeek as saying,

“Spending on security is rising 6 percent a year… But spending on the labor needed to manage that security is rising 11 percent a year; therefore we need to help SMBs remove some of the cost by offering solutions as fully managed services.”

IBM will sell these services to SMBs through its ISS channels, but you can bet it will also offer them directly to some of its larger, key accounts.

Meanwhile, in its announcement of the completion of its $155 million acquisition of MessageOne, the company said:

“With its acquisition of SilverBack Technologies, Inc., Everdream Corp., ASAP Software Express, Inc. and now MessageOne, Dell is architecting an integrated service delivery platform of SaaS applications that will enable it to remotely monitor, maintain, troubleshoot and address the majority of routine IT infrastructure issues that challenge businesses of all sizes. The company anticipates that services such as patch management, anti-virus, online backup and recovery, asset tracking, software license management and e-mail continuity delivered and managed over the Internet will reduce the cost of infrastructure management and free budget for the IT driven innovation that grows business.”

This statement makes more explicit the strategic implications which I outlined earlier this year.

Dell’s President of Global Services, Steve Schuckenbrock, goes on to say that Dell is “building a services supply chain” that will give customers greater flexibility regarding how they support their IT environments.

Again, Dell is offering these services to its growing array of channel partners but is also expecting to deliver these services directly to its key accounts.

So, channel organizations must determine how to fully leverage these offerings while at the same time effectively differentiating themselves from others, including the vendors, who will be offering the same managed services.

For years, I’ve been advocating that hardware and software vendors along with their channel partners and telecommunications carriers have the opportunity to leverage Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) solutions and managed services models to generate powerful benchmark statistics and produce valuable best practice studies that can enhance their customer relationships and strengthen their position in the market.

Today, TriActive and THINKstrategies published the first of a series of benchmark studies which clearly demonstrates this unique capability.

The study examines end-user software utilization patterns across over 125,000 endpoints in 460 companies managed by TriActive’s Asset Management Suite™. The study found many companies where Microsoft Office installations are underutilized or not used at all. This means that many companies have more software licenses than necessary or have purchased higher than necessary versions of the software to meet their needs.

Based on this actual software utilization data, the study found that many companies can save 50% or more on their Microsoft Office software licensing costs by better matching their purchases to actual useage levels.

Ironically, many of the companies studied had deployed TriActive’s Asset Management Suite via managed service providers (MSPs) and value-added resellers (VARs) because they were concerned that they may have illegal copies of Microsoft software in their businesses and expected to have to ‘true-up’ to ensure they were in compliance. Rather than pay more, many of these companies will actually experience significant cost-savings as a result of TriActive’s Asset Management capabilities and findings of this study.

The TriActive-THINKstrategies study illustrates the power of today’s SaaS-based managed services not just as a more economical method of managing IT operations and tracking real software utilization, but also as a means of delivering a new level of value to customers.

Having helped launch META Group’s (remember them?) benchmarking practice in the 1990s, I’ve had first-hand experience grappling with the costs and complexities of traditional benchmark methodologies which too often failed to generate meaningful information or insight.

In contrast, today’s SaaS solutions permit service providers (xSPs) and channel companies to obtain actual useage statistics that can provide actionable data for individual companies and powerful perspective for a broader community of customers.

While I was running International Network Services’ (INS) strategic marketing group in the late 1990s, we launched an industry research program which generating survey findings and gave us tremendous visibility in the market that catapulted INS to the top of Yankee Group and UpSide Magazine’s leading IT consulting company list in 1999–above Anderson Consulting, CSC, EDS, HP and IBM. That designation led to INS being acquired by Lucent for 12 times revenues or $3.7 billion, the most ever paid for an IT services company and surpassing what IBM paid for PWC Consulting. (INS is still doing its industry surveys as a part of BT today.)

Innovative SaaS and managed service providers can achieve even greater thought-leadership and win greater mindshare today by capturing and compiling valuable activity data through their ongoing interaction with customers. They can utilize this data and analysis to better serve their customers and better position themselves in the market.

I look forward to working with more companies who recognize this exciting opportunity. Contact me if you want to discuss this opportunity further.

Since Michael Dell returned to the helm of his company, he has been dramatically reshaping its channel and services strategies. He is also putting the IT industry on notice that the way hardware companies define and deliver services is changing.

The old guard of the IT industry recognized in the 1980s and 1990s that tech support, professional services and outsourcing could generate lucrative revenues and create greater lock-in opportunities in an increasingly commoditized hardware business. Lou Gerstner saved IBM by turning it into a services company.

Dell bucked this trend by investing in sophisticated supply-chain, fulfillment and customer service processes which enabled it to succeed as a low-cost, high-margin manufacturer.

HP stole a page from Dell’s book and usurped its price advantage. Without a strong services story to serve as a safety-net, Dell was vulnerable to customer defections. It is now seeking to regain its competitive advantage by redefining how services are delivered. In the old world, services were a people-intensive business and highly customized. Dell plans to automate and simplify the way services are delivered.

After acquiring SilverBack Technologies and Everdream in 2007, Dell acquired MessageOne this past week. MessageOne is a leading provider of Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) enabled enterprise-class e-mail business continuity, compliance, archiving and disaster recovery services. MessageOne is in the same business as Postini, which Google acquired last year to fortify its Gmail capabilities and recently rolled out as an enterprise-class email archival service.

What makes Dell’s acquisition intriguing is the fact that it doesn’t offer an email service. But, that isn’t stopping Dell from adding this functionality to its rapidly growing portfolio of SaaS capabilities that now include remote desktop, server, security and helpdesk management services.

Dell has promised to deliver these SaaS capabilities via its growing array of channel partners to support their managed service offerings, but has also admitted that it will utilize them to support some of its customers directly. This direct service capability and a history of ignoring resellers has led to rising concerns among channel companies that Dell is going to commoditize their traditional on-site support business.

Dell isn’t just SaaSifying its services business.

Dell also unveiled this week a new Storage Simplification Assessment program which Dell promises will simplify the process of evaluating and selecting storage, backup, recovery and archiving solutions. Dell will offer these assessments directly and through its channel partners.

Dell has also restructured its customer support portfolio, consolidating its previous offerings into two simple options,

1. ProSupport for IT
2. ProSupport for End-Users

At Ziff-Davis’ recent Channel Summit, Dell’s channel czar in the Americas–Greg Davis–was asked if Dell intends to commoditize services the way it commoditized the hardware business. He said no, it planned to simplify the way services are packaged and priced.

If Dell’s moves are successful, they will encourage customers to set new standards for how services are sold and delivered. This will force other technology companies to restructure their service portfolios and streamline their delivery mechanisms in order to compete. It will also force channel companies to re-think how they package, price and position their services.

Salesforce.com rolled out its Force.com Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) enablement platform last week after plenty of fanfare at its Dreamforce conference in September. The launch of the platform has sparked a new round of debates regarding the merits of Salesforce.com’s application development toolkit and its service delivery capabilities.

I’ve said many times in this blog and elsewhere, there is no more important or innovative player in the SaaS market than Salesforce.com. Every SaaS user and SaaS provider owes a debt of gratitude to Marc Benioff and Salesforce.com for pioneering the on-demand software services market and setting the standard for enterprise-class SaaS solutions.

While some elements in Salesforce.com’s strategies and solutions can be criticized as self-serving or ineffective, the company’s overall impact on the growth of the SaaS market cannot be denied.

Salesforce.com has set the bar for designing simple yet effective web-based business applications. It has shown how business applications can replicate the simplicity of popular on-demand services, while proving that SaaS can still meet the rigorous requirements of today’s corporate compliance regulations. It has also devised successful sales strategies for selling these applications to business end-users rather than IT departments.

Salesforce.com could have easily kept these accomplishments to itself in order to build its lead in the SaaS market, but wisely recognized that its long-term success depended on its ability to build an ecosystem of third-party applications and services around its core offerings.

This is the same strategy which has made every software company before it successful, including Microsoft, Oracle and SAP. These companies, and others, built their ecosystems and expanded their market penetration by making it easy for third-party developers to build applications on their software architectures. That is exactly what Salesforce.com set out to do with its AppExchange and is now extending with its Force.com platform.

Others may bicker about the iterative way in which Salesforce.com has evolved its platform capabilities and branding strategy from its AppExchange roots to its current Force.com form. But, what other company has created the same runway for SaaS solutions?

When it comes to SaaS platforms and partner ecosystems, the established players are still getting their acts together. Microsoft is a work in progress. Google is an enigma. Oracle is seen as primarily a database company. And, IBM is primarily good for middleware and hosting services. But, none has created a comparable set of platform tools and partner programs to match Salesforce.com.

Disclosure: Salesforce.com commissioned me to produce whitepapers regarding the Force.com and AppExchange.

Since the holidays are traditionally a time for people to take stock of the year past and offer their new year forecasts, here are my top ten predictions why the shift from packaged products to Software-as-a-Service (SaaS), utility computing and managed services will accelerate in 2008:

1. Services are Recession Proof: Escalating oil prices, the uncertain political landscape and faltering financial institutions beset with the aftereffects of the sub-prime lending debacle could mean a tough year for the economy. In this tenuous climate, consumer and executive confidence could decline, leading to an economic slowdown. As a result, many companies could hold back on their capital investments to mitigate their risks. The ability to adopt on-demand services on a pay-as-you-go basis will be a perfect sourcing strategy for businesses seeking greater cost-controls and flexibility.

2. Everyone’s Going Virtual: Most industry pundits and participants view virtualization as a technology trend, but it is also a business trend. Employees are increasingly working outside the four walls of a traditional office. Gen Y workers are always on the move and online. Traditional, on-premise applications and centralized servers sitting behind a firewall can’t effectively serve today’s mobile workers. SaaS and managed services are perfectly suited for these new, virtual business requirements.

3. Amazon, IBM and Google Bet on Utility Computing. After experimenting with its Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) for the past year, Amazon has found plenty of demand for its computing power on-demand platform from startups, as well as established companies seeking a ‘sandbox’ for their new initiatives. Amazon is now confident it can deliver its computing power in a reliable and cost-effective fashion to a broader market of business users. So, expect more aggressive PR and marketing efforts to promote and sell this powerful utility computing service.

IBM Blue Tune: IBM originated the term on-demand and then walked away from the utility computing market seeking new opportunities among the avatars. When Amazon proved that the utility computing concept could become a reality, IBM repackaged its autonomous computing ideas in the form of a new ‘blue cloud’ initiative. Big Blue will push the idea hard in 2008.

The GooglePlex Makes It Move. Google is tired of sitting on the sidelines while Amazon’s success and IBM’s new ‘blue cloud’ initiative, Google has initiated a PR campaign to promote its ‘cloud’ computing capabilities and strategies. The GooglePlex has long been considered the prototype for a new large-scale computing architecture. Now Google’s incredibly scalable and economical computing engine is getting the attention of business pubs like BusinessWeek, the Wall Street Journal and other mainstream pubs.

4. Nick Carr Returns: In truth, he never left us. It was Carr who gave utility computing a major push with his seminal article in the Harvard Business Review and follow-on book questioning whether IT mattered. Despite venomous criticisms from many IT pubs and professionals, Carr became a popular speaker at corporate events because his message resonated with business executives and end-users. Now, he is putting the finishing touches on his second book, The Big Switch: Rewiring the World, from Edison to Google, which will be published on January 7, 2008. Although IT folks love to hate him, Carr has never lost his luster among corporate executives and end-users who agree with his basic premise that IT is a needless hassle and should be as easy as electricity and as reliable as a utility.

5. SaaS Solves SOX: A year ago, most publicly traded companies and other large-scale enterprises rejected the idea of SaaS because they thought they needed to take greater responsibility for their own compliance requirements. Now, they view the process controls, auditability and offsite hosting features common in most SaaS applications as a perfect solution for their Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) needs. As a result, enterprise adoption of SaaS will accelerate.

6. Managed Services 3.0, Unified Communications Services and Service Automation: In the 80s, managed services were really outsourcing agreements offered by carriers to their largest corporate customers. In the 90s, a new generation of standalone MSPs promised managed services for SMBs. Neither model succeeded.

Today, we are entering a new age of managed services. Managed Services 3.0 combines the experience of the past with powerful new technologies to respond to growing customer demand. Cisco Systems will be pushing its IP communications and WebEx capabilities hard, while Microsoft promotes the virtues of its various “software plus services” solutions. The two are on a collision course in the unified messaging and communications market, but that will mean that they will each spend plenty on market education and channel sales programs.

At the same time, Dell will be leveraging its SilverBack Technologies and Everdream acquisitions to deliver a new set of automated, remote desktop and server management capabilities through channel partners and direct support services. Expect to hear more from HP and others.

7. Carriers and Channel Companies Find Success With New Services: Carriers have been perplexed about how to package, price and promote profitable managed services. VARs have been afraid that SaaS would ‘dis-intermediate’ them by eliminating their consulting and custom application development business. Carriers now see an opportunity to deliver an integrated package of IT managed services and SaaS business solutions to add value to their commoditized dial-tone services. Channel companies are also discovering that there are still consulting and customization opportunities in the SaaS market. As a result, carriers and channel companies will lend their marketing and sales support to managed services and SaaS.

8. Failure Doesn’t Matter: NaviSite suffered an extended outage in November and the on-demand services movement didn’t miss a beat. The trade press is now looking for horror stories rather than success stories regarding SaaS and managed services, but the vast majority of stories have been positive. In fact, my third annual SaaS survey in conjunction with Cutter Consortium found 100% satisfaction among the companies currently using on-demand software services. The upcoming SaaScon conference will highlight some of these customer success stories. THINKstrategies will also spotlight these stories throughout 2008.

9. IT Discovers Services are the Solution: In the past, the IT department was the biggest barrier to managed services and SaaS adoption. Many IT professionals were afraid these on-demand solutions would eliminate their jobs. Now, a growing proportion of IT people see managed services and SaaS as a way to out-task mundane work or overcome complex application/technology deployment and maintenance responsibilities. As they learn to take advantage of these on-demand solutions, IT departments will finally be able to put their daily firefights aside and focus on addressing the strategic needs of their business users.

10. Wall Street Buys Into Services: Some of the most successful IPOs of 2007 were in the SaaS market. Wall Street loves the predictability of subscription services and now that it has a solid set of market ‘comps’ to measure business success in the services market, it will be encouraging more privately held companies to go through the IPO door. At the same time, private equity funds will be encouraging publicly traded software companies to go private to enable them to shift to a SaaS model without the public market pressures. And, the investment bankers will be pushing a wide array of M&A activity. Expect the offshore IT/business process outsourcers (IT/BPO) and business services companies to buy SaaS vendors. Look for more consolidation in the managed services market.

Bonus Driver of Services Growth in 2008: THINKstrategies will be expanding its consulting and marketing programs aimed at educating IT/business decision-makers about the benefits of on-demand services, and continuing to help software and technology providers develop and deliver successful service solutions. Stay tuned to the SaaS and Managed Services Showplaces for more information and insight about these new programs and features.

IBM’s acquisition of Arsenal Digital Solutions is the latest transaction driven by the growing concern among businesses of all sizes that they have to do more to protect their electronic files in order to safeguard against natural disasters and satisfy escalating regulations.

What makes this trend even more interesting is that it has brought greater attention to the fundamental advantages of using a “hosted”, managed service to respond to these business concerns. This has made a widening array of storage, e-discovery and other managed service providers (MSPs) very attractive acquisition targets for an expanding assortment of potential buyers.

Here are a few of the acquisitions which preceeded IBM’s announcement,

• Seagate $185 million purchase of EVault
• EMC’s $76 million acquisition of Berkeley Data Systems Inc.’s Mozy storage service
• Autonomy’s $375 million acquisition of email archiving service provider Zantaz Inc.
• A series of acquisitions by Iron Mountain, including the $158 million purchase of Stratify, Inc., an e-discovery services firm.

Even Google’s acquisition of Postini was driven, in part, by the need to provide greater archiving capabilities within Gmail if it is to be accepted by mid- to large-scale businesses.

The explosion of digital files, ranging from email to patients’ records, is forcing businesses of all sizes to reevaluate their storage strategies and archival systems. Intense media coverage of the latest natural disasters has made everyone more sensitive to the risks associated with failing to properly back-up and store valuable computer files.

What began as a simple consumer craze with services like Flickr to handle personal pictures, has quickly morphed into a potentially lucrative managed service opportunity.

As consumers move from personal worlds into their professional workplaces, they are becoming equally aware of the need to better protect their corporate documents and records. And having enjoyed the ease-of-use and economic advantages of a back-up and retrieval service for their personal needs, they are seeking a similar solution for their business requirements.

So, it shouldn’t be surprising that storage vendors like Seagate, EMC and now IBM are adding these services to their corporate portfolios via acquisitions. Telcos, ISPs and hosting companies are already leveraging their communications infrastructure and server facilities to offer similar managed storage, back-up and disaster recovery services. Even Microsoft and Dell are offering inexpensive storage services to their customers. Expect HP and others to follow suit.

This trend represents a challenge and opportunity for traditional business continuity and disaster recovery service providers, such as Sungard. The challenge is that they must rearchitect their services to compete with the more focused and less expensive managed services of today. The opportunity is that if they succeed in their restructuring efforts, they will have a far larger market opportunity to attack.

Utility computing is one of those IT industry concepts which has taken a long time to evolve into reality.

While discussions about this idea were mostly theoretical when it first emerged at the turn of this new century, today a new generation of players is turning the theory into an actuality.

After it helped to originate the idea, IBM is now trying to play catch up in the rapidly evolving utility computing market.

You can read my views about this ironic twist of fate on ITworld’s Utility Computing portal.